My observations on pictures shot by Henri Cartier-Bresson, known for his expertise in capturing Candid shots and 'Decisive Moment'
LEADING LINES
- feels like the stairs lead us to the subject.
- the person is also captured in a manner that follows the rule of thirds very well.
- the element of slight motion blur is also there because of the cyclist.
- however, the top of the image has elements like doors and brick walls which could've been avoided.
- makes me think, is the better because it has those little details in the background is does it seem noisy and cluttered?
- good symmetry, even though it does not follow the rule of thirds, the picture has balance.
- concept of leading lines is very prominent, the walls guiding you right towards the subject.
- the subject choice is excellent, like capturing a conversation between the cat and the man.
- the roads leading you right towards the trees
- rule of thirds is also followed (the canopy of the tree is placed the intersection of lines)
- good composition, but very blurry image.
RULE OF THIRDS
- amazing composition and application of rule of thirds.
- there's also a good contrast, and the leaves in the background only seem to beautify the subject even more.
- while the image seems to speak a lot more than I'm supposed to mention here, the rule of thirds is evident.
- the subject could've been in the center but keeping him towards slight left gives more space for the background to tell the story the photographer wanted to perhaps capture.
- is the person grieving the loss of someone? are the people in the background metaphorical for the people he's lost?
- good freeze and rule of thirds.
- however, who's the subject? the birds or the person?
- too many elements in the picture.
- would the picture have been a better example of rule of thirds has the person not been in it? just curious.
FREEZE
- good freeze shot.
- what striked the most to me was the contrast between the smiles/joyous faces of the kids compared to the destruction they're in (broken walls below their feet).
- the way the photo was shot through a hole in the wall, adds a feeling like we're watching a movie or peeping into someone else's life.
- A fair amalgamation of freeze and rule of thirds.
- why is there a man in the back though? what story is the photographer trying to tell?
- if we look at it from a composition point of view only, would the picture have been better without the man in back?
MOTION BLUR
- a good picture in terms of the story it seems to tell- a person trying to steal something and escape (in my opinion)
- the motion blur is good. the contrasting white and black statues, the height differences - amazing.
- but the head of the statue is cut, there's no symmetry or composition rules being applied, does it reduce the overall effect of the picture?
Comments
Post a Comment